conclusion

the resubmission is much more in depth and thought at then the previous submission. unlike the first one i am very happy with the outcome and enjoyed it much more. the website is much more developed, providing a deeper look at biospark and a providing a good framework for the ideas i am exploring through the work. the site is structurally well presented with the only things i am unhappy with being the problem of trying to get rid of the reply box underneath each post and also some issues i had with page layout, but as this is a blogging site it works very well considering. i am presenting only two illustrations on the site, they are much more developed and look great, they also give the feel that intended and work well in the work, the first image shows the tower, a gleaming, crystaline , soaring structure embodying mans dreams and representing the crowning achievement of technological advancement, this is my aspect of the evolution of electricity, the second shows the subsequent conflict stemming from the technology used, specifically in the a.i, this is relating to frankensteins monster and i think the analogy works well in the modern context. i also think that the concept of fire ties in very well through the mythology and ideas behind prometheus, which also ties into mary shelleys novel, i think it is also represented in the darker side of the situation through conflict and the eventual destruction of the tower. the way i have told the story through 'news articles' works well i think as an outside view of the conflict, however im not sure it works as well as it should being on the biospark website. overall i think the work extends my ideas very well and is a much better presentation.